Submit Output for Endorsement CoARA Output Endorsement Nomination Form InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Nominator Contact InformationThe nominator submitting an output for endorsement should include their contact details.Contact name(Required)First name, Last name, preferred titleContact email(Required)Email address where we can contact you for follow up.Contact organisation(Required)Please indicate your affiliated organisation.Nominated Output InformationRelevant information for the output nominated for endorsement, including Nominator Group, Endorsement Type, and a link to the full output PDF.Select the relevant Nominator Group / CoARA Community(Required)Working GroupNational ChapterCascade Funding BeneficiaryOther / third partyPlease indicate if you are submitting the nomination of an output on behalf of a WG, NC, CF project, or third party.Working Group Name(Required)WG ACAWG EMCRsWG ERIPWG Experiments in AssessmentWG Improving Practices in the Assessment of Research ProposalsWG MultilingualismWG OI4RRAWG Recognizing and Rewarding Peer ReviewWG RMIWG Supporting the Alignment of RA in Biomedical Disciplines Through Admin. Reforms and GovernanceWG SSHWG TIERWG Towards TransformationsWG Subgroup TitleIf you're submitting an output on behalf of a subgroup, please indicate the name here.National Chapter(Required)AndorraCyprusFinlandFranceGermanyHungaryIrelandItalyNetherlandsNorwayPolandPortugalSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUkraineUnited KingdomCascade Funding Beneficiary(Required)CF1 Pilot ProjectCF1 Teaming ProjectCF1 Institutional Change ProjectCF2 Pilot ProjectCF2 Teaming ProjectCF2 Institutional Change ProjectCF Project Title and Name of Lead Organisation(Required)Organisation Name(s) submitting 3rd Party Output(Required)I would like to submit my output for the following endorsement type(Required)Type A: Actionable Policy Resource (subject to SB review)Type B: Evidence Based Review (community review)Title of Output(Required)Zenodo link to full output(Required) Prior to submitting your output for nomination, please publish it as part of the relevant Zenodo Community (WGs, NCs, CF, etc., see Publication Guidelines for more details). Please copy the DOI here. Publishing under restricted access shared with the CoARA Secretariat is also possible at this stage.Output abstract / description(Required)200 word abstract to be used as a description, providing an overview of the aims and content of the output, and to explain why the output fits into Type A or Type B category. The description should also include use case scenarios. This may also serve as the basis for the abstract that will later appear as a description of the output on the CoARA website.Community ReviewProvide information on the scope, type, and expected timeline for your community review period.Describe the type of reviewers selected for your Community Review(Required)(i.e., CoARA Working Group, National Chapter, invited experts, open consultation)Expected timeline for Community Review period(Required)Provide desired dates for the opening/closing of the Community Consultation periodScope of Community Review Group(Required) 1-10 10-20 WG and/or NC Co-Chairs Open consultation Other, please specify Indicate the size of your selected Community Reviewer groupPlease indicate here why you selected "Other":(Required)Please outline the specifications of the scope your Community Review here.Hosting platform for Community Consultation(Required)CoARA websiteAlternative PlatformAlternative platform for Community Consultation(Required)Google docWeb formSharepointOther, please specifySpecify alternative hosting platform for Community Consultation(Required)Reviewers' contact information(Required) Add RemovePlease provide the name, email, title, and organisation of your reviewer community. Metadata fieldsProvide information on metadata fields to be included for the publication of your output following the Endorsement process.Type of outputi.e., Framework, Guidelines, Toolkit, Policy Recommendations, Literature Review, White Paper, Survey findingsTarget Audience(Required) Select All Academies, learned societies, and their associations National/regional authorities or agencies Research Funding Organisations (public or private) Research Performing Organisations (research centres, infrastructures, etc.) Universities and their associations Other relevant non-for-profit organisations Please indicate the organisation type of the intended audience for the nominated output.CoARA Commitments addressed(Required) 1. Recognise diverse contributions to, and careers in, research 2. Base research assessment primarily on qualitative evaluation for which peer review is central, supported by responsible use of qualitative indicators 3. Abandon inappropriate uses in RA of journal- and publication-based metrics, esp. JIF and h-index 4. Avoid the use of rankings research organisations in research assessment 5. Commit resources to reforming research assessment as is needed to achieve the organisational changes committed to 6. Review and develop research assessment criteria, tools and processes 7. Raise awareness of research assessment reform and provide transparent communication, guidance, and training on assessment criteria and processes 8. Exchange practices and experiences to enable mutual learning within and beyond the Coalition 9. Communicate progress made on adherence to the Principles and implementation of the Commitments 10. Evaluate practices, criteria and tools based on solid evidence and the state-of-the-art in research on research, and make data openly available for evidence gathering and research Relevant keywordsList a series of keywords that could be used as relevant tags for your output.
